Review



proc multtest  (SAS institute)


Bioz Verified Symbol SAS institute is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    SAS institute proc multtest
    The meal timing intervention significantly modified the impact of simulated night work on <t>pNN50</t> ( A , B ), RMSSD ( C , D ), LF/HF ( E , F ) and PAI-1 ( G , H ) levels. For all results, cosinor mixed-model analyses were used, and the interaction of meal timing group vs. pre/post simulated night work is reported in the figures. Cosine curves make use of precise circadian phase of each measurement for each participant. Circles indicate data grouped into 15°-circadian windows (~1-hour resolution, except for PAI-1 that is presented with 2-h resolution) with SEM error bars and the top x axes were scaled to the approximate group-averaged clock time of the circadian CBT minimum (reflected by 0 o ) for reference (i.e., relative clock time). Data correspond to the average (mean ± SEM) across participants per pre/post simulated night work condition and per meal timing group ( n = 10 in the NMC group and n = 9 in the DMI group).
    Proc Multtest, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/proc multtest/product/SAS institute
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    proc multtest - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Daytime eating during simulated night work mitigates changes in cardiovascular risk factors: secondary analyses of a randomized controlled trial"

    Article Title: Daytime eating during simulated night work mitigates changes in cardiovascular risk factors: secondary analyses of a randomized controlled trial

    Journal: Nature Communications

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57846-y

    The meal timing intervention significantly modified the impact of simulated night work on pNN50 ( A , B ), RMSSD ( C , D ), LF/HF ( E , F ) and PAI-1 ( G , H ) levels. For all results, cosinor mixed-model analyses were used, and the interaction of meal timing group vs. pre/post simulated night work is reported in the figures. Cosine curves make use of precise circadian phase of each measurement for each participant. Circles indicate data grouped into 15°-circadian windows (~1-hour resolution, except for PAI-1 that is presented with 2-h resolution) with SEM error bars and the top x axes were scaled to the approximate group-averaged clock time of the circadian CBT minimum (reflected by 0 o ) for reference (i.e., relative clock time). Data correspond to the average (mean ± SEM) across participants per pre/post simulated night work condition and per meal timing group ( n = 10 in the NMC group and n = 9 in the DMI group).
    Figure Legend Snippet: The meal timing intervention significantly modified the impact of simulated night work on pNN50 ( A , B ), RMSSD ( C , D ), LF/HF ( E , F ) and PAI-1 ( G , H ) levels. For all results, cosinor mixed-model analyses were used, and the interaction of meal timing group vs. pre/post simulated night work is reported in the figures. Cosine curves make use of precise circadian phase of each measurement for each participant. Circles indicate data grouped into 15°-circadian windows (~1-hour resolution, except for PAI-1 that is presented with 2-h resolution) with SEM error bars and the top x axes were scaled to the approximate group-averaged clock time of the circadian CBT minimum (reflected by 0 o ) for reference (i.e., relative clock time). Data correspond to the average (mean ± SEM) across participants per pre/post simulated night work condition and per meal timing group ( n = 10 in the NMC group and n = 9 in the DMI group).

    Techniques Used: Modification



    Similar Products

    90
    SAS institute proc multtest
    The meal timing intervention significantly modified the impact of simulated night work on <t>pNN50</t> ( A , B ), RMSSD ( C , D ), LF/HF ( E , F ) and PAI-1 ( G , H ) levels. For all results, cosinor mixed-model analyses were used, and the interaction of meal timing group vs. pre/post simulated night work is reported in the figures. Cosine curves make use of precise circadian phase of each measurement for each participant. Circles indicate data grouped into 15°-circadian windows (~1-hour resolution, except for PAI-1 that is presented with 2-h resolution) with SEM error bars and the top x axes were scaled to the approximate group-averaged clock time of the circadian CBT minimum (reflected by 0 o ) for reference (i.e., relative clock time). Data correspond to the average (mean ± SEM) across participants per pre/post simulated night work condition and per meal timing group ( n = 10 in the NMC group and n = 9 in the DMI group).
    Proc Multtest, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/proc multtest/product/SAS institute
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    proc multtest - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    SAS institute proc multtest function
    The meal timing intervention significantly modified the impact of simulated night work on <t>pNN50</t> ( A , B ), RMSSD ( C , D ), LF/HF ( E , F ) and PAI-1 ( G , H ) levels. For all results, cosinor mixed-model analyses were used, and the interaction of meal timing group vs. pre/post simulated night work is reported in the figures. Cosine curves make use of precise circadian phase of each measurement for each participant. Circles indicate data grouped into 15°-circadian windows (~1-hour resolution, except for PAI-1 that is presented with 2-h resolution) with SEM error bars and the top x axes were scaled to the approximate group-averaged clock time of the circadian CBT minimum (reflected by 0 o ) for reference (i.e., relative clock time). Data correspond to the average (mean ± SEM) across participants per pre/post simulated night work condition and per meal timing group ( n = 10 in the NMC group and n = 9 in the DMI group).
    Proc Multtest Function, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/proc multtest function/product/SAS institute
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    proc multtest function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    SAS institute proc multtest fdr test mean function
    The meal timing intervention significantly modified the impact of simulated night work on <t>pNN50</t> ( A , B ), RMSSD ( C , D ), LF/HF ( E , F ) and PAI-1 ( G , H ) levels. For all results, cosinor mixed-model analyses were used, and the interaction of meal timing group vs. pre/post simulated night work is reported in the figures. Cosine curves make use of precise circadian phase of each measurement for each participant. Circles indicate data grouped into 15°-circadian windows (~1-hour resolution, except for PAI-1 that is presented with 2-h resolution) with SEM error bars and the top x axes were scaled to the approximate group-averaged clock time of the circadian CBT minimum (reflected by 0 o ) for reference (i.e., relative clock time). Data correspond to the average (mean ± SEM) across participants per pre/post simulated night work condition and per meal timing group ( n = 10 in the NMC group and n = 9 in the DMI group).
    Proc Multtest Fdr Test Mean Function, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/proc multtest fdr test mean function/product/SAS institute
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    proc multtest fdr test mean function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    SAS institute proc multtest procedure
    The meal timing intervention significantly modified the impact of simulated night work on <t>pNN50</t> ( A , B ), RMSSD ( C , D ), LF/HF ( E , F ) and PAI-1 ( G , H ) levels. For all results, cosinor mixed-model analyses were used, and the interaction of meal timing group vs. pre/post simulated night work is reported in the figures. Cosine curves make use of precise circadian phase of each measurement for each participant. Circles indicate data grouped into 15°-circadian windows (~1-hour resolution, except for PAI-1 that is presented with 2-h resolution) with SEM error bars and the top x axes were scaled to the approximate group-averaged clock time of the circadian CBT minimum (reflected by 0 o ) for reference (i.e., relative clock time). Data correspond to the average (mean ± SEM) across participants per pre/post simulated night work condition and per meal timing group ( n = 10 in the NMC group and n = 9 in the DMI group).
    Proc Multtest Procedure, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/proc multtest procedure/product/SAS institute
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    proc multtest procedure - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    SAS institute proc multtest fdr test mean
    The meal timing intervention significantly modified the impact of simulated night work on <t>pNN50</t> ( A , B ), RMSSD ( C , D ), LF/HF ( E , F ) and PAI-1 ( G , H ) levels. For all results, cosinor mixed-model analyses were used, and the interaction of meal timing group vs. pre/post simulated night work is reported in the figures. Cosine curves make use of precise circadian phase of each measurement for each participant. Circles indicate data grouped into 15°-circadian windows (~1-hour resolution, except for PAI-1 that is presented with 2-h resolution) with SEM error bars and the top x axes were scaled to the approximate group-averaged clock time of the circadian CBT minimum (reflected by 0 o ) for reference (i.e., relative clock time). Data correspond to the average (mean ± SEM) across participants per pre/post simulated night work condition and per meal timing group ( n = 10 in the NMC group and n = 9 in the DMI group).
    Proc Multtest Fdr Test Mean, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/proc multtest fdr test mean/product/SAS institute
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    proc multtest fdr test mean - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    SAS institute sas proc multtest
    The meal timing intervention significantly modified the impact of simulated night work on <t>pNN50</t> ( A , B ), RMSSD ( C , D ), LF/HF ( E , F ) and PAI-1 ( G , H ) levels. For all results, cosinor mixed-model analyses were used, and the interaction of meal timing group vs. pre/post simulated night work is reported in the figures. Cosine curves make use of precise circadian phase of each measurement for each participant. Circles indicate data grouped into 15°-circadian windows (~1-hour resolution, except for PAI-1 that is presented with 2-h resolution) with SEM error bars and the top x axes were scaled to the approximate group-averaged clock time of the circadian CBT minimum (reflected by 0 o ) for reference (i.e., relative clock time). Data correspond to the average (mean ± SEM) across participants per pre/post simulated night work condition and per meal timing group ( n = 10 in the NMC group and n = 9 in the DMI group).
    Sas Proc Multtest, supplied by SAS institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/sas proc multtest/product/SAS institute
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    sas proc multtest - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    The meal timing intervention significantly modified the impact of simulated night work on pNN50 ( A , B ), RMSSD ( C , D ), LF/HF ( E , F ) and PAI-1 ( G , H ) levels. For all results, cosinor mixed-model analyses were used, and the interaction of meal timing group vs. pre/post simulated night work is reported in the figures. Cosine curves make use of precise circadian phase of each measurement for each participant. Circles indicate data grouped into 15°-circadian windows (~1-hour resolution, except for PAI-1 that is presented with 2-h resolution) with SEM error bars and the top x axes were scaled to the approximate group-averaged clock time of the circadian CBT minimum (reflected by 0 o ) for reference (i.e., relative clock time). Data correspond to the average (mean ± SEM) across participants per pre/post simulated night work condition and per meal timing group ( n = 10 in the NMC group and n = 9 in the DMI group).

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Daytime eating during simulated night work mitigates changes in cardiovascular risk factors: secondary analyses of a randomized controlled trial

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57846-y

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The meal timing intervention significantly modified the impact of simulated night work on pNN50 ( A , B ), RMSSD ( C , D ), LF/HF ( E , F ) and PAI-1 ( G , H ) levels. For all results, cosinor mixed-model analyses were used, and the interaction of meal timing group vs. pre/post simulated night work is reported in the figures. Cosine curves make use of precise circadian phase of each measurement for each participant. Circles indicate data grouped into 15°-circadian windows (~1-hour resolution, except for PAI-1 that is presented with 2-h resolution) with SEM error bars and the top x axes were scaled to the approximate group-averaged clock time of the circadian CBT minimum (reflected by 0 o ) for reference (i.e., relative clock time). Data correspond to the average (mean ± SEM) across participants per pre/post simulated night work condition and per meal timing group ( n = 10 in the NMC group and n = 9 in the DMI group).

    Article Snippet: To control overall type I error in null hypothesis testing when conducting multiple comparisons, P -values from the mixed-model analysis were adjusted using False Discovery Rates ( p FDR) (PROC MULTTEST, SAS) for the primary (i.e., pNN50, RMSSD, LF/HF ratio) and secondary (PAI-1) cardiovascular outcomes.

    Techniques: Modification